By Spencer
Everyone interested in analyzing the election should look at these maps:
Maps of the 2008 US presidential election results.
the difference when you map by population, etc.., rather than by land area are striking
Related Posts by Categories
Democracy
- Health Care billing examples. The "public option" can't work.
- If You Think I Believe it's 1931 Again, You Should Ask the Greek Guy
- Income distribution and GDP, it matters
- Income distribution and GDP, it matters
- Election Maps
- The Optimistic Version of Yesterday
- The Optimistic Version of Yesterday
- The WSJ version of History
- The WSJ version of History
- Two Things Someone Else Needs to Discuss
- Two Things Someone Else Needs to Discuss
2008 presidential
- Reasons to be Cheerful
- Reasons to be Cheerful
- The WSJ Editorial Page Talks, the Market Listens
- The WSJ Editorial Page Talks, the Market Listens
- Election Maps
- Coffee, Tea, or You?
- Coffee, Tea, or You?
- The Real Difference with 2004
- The Real Difference with 2004
- The Optimistic Version of Yesterday
- The Optimistic Version of Yesterday
- Without Need of Other Comment
- Without Need of Other Comment
- Tin Soldiers and Nixon's Going...
- Tin Soldiers and Nixon's Going...
- Noted for the Record
- Noted for the Record
- Obama Leads with 71.4% of the Vote
- Obama Leads with 71.4% of the Vote
- Apparently, Public Financing has been Very Good to John McCain
- Apparently, Public Financing has been Very Good to John McCain
- It's All My Fault
- It's All My Fault
- Tom Toles is a Priceless National Treasure, Volume X
Post a Comment