Since I'm trying to cut a 24-page paper down closer to 15 today, I'll leave the Heavy Lifting to other. But two things probably should be discussed (or at least noted) here:
- Brad DeLong appears (to me) to confuse perceiving a move from Democratic Republic to Empire—and therefore away from any Competitive Advantage for the past 100-ish years—with conspiracy theory. But I may just be reacting to his headline.
- Tim Duy (at Mark Thoma's place) refuses to jump into the briar patch:
Increasingly, society views the purchase of a home as primarily an investment, not for the service it provides (don’t even get me started on this topic).
Someone needs to get him started. Or continue from Tom's previous AB post.
Related Posts by Categories
Brad DeLong- Brad DeLong is Correct
- Brad's Draft Lecture
- When in Crisis, Insult Sociologists?
- Verklaerte KristolNacht
- Coming Soon from Major Economists Near You
- Thanks to Ben Bernanke, Ben Bernanke Doesn't Need to be Reappointed as Fed Chair
- Those Who Think the "Left of Center" is Too Tough on N. Gregory Mankiw
- Simple Answers to Simple Questions, CRA edition
- curiouser and curiouser capitalist
- Silliness from Time Magazine
- Tom Toles is a Priceless National Treasure, Vol XIII
- I Agree with Hank Paulson, not Paul Krugman
- Back-of-the-Envelope: Making Sense of TARP
- Being sub-A, we try harder?
- Brad DeLong (Desperately?) Tries to Rationalise the Giveaway
- Stimulus Update
- Game, Set, and Match
- Why Can Asset Prices Fall
- NBER generally gets it right
- NBER generally gets it right
- In Which I Say Something Nice about Lawrence Summers
- In Which I Say Something Nice about Lawrence Summers
- On the Internet, no one knows you're a Nobel Prize-winning Economist*
- On the Internet, no one knows you're a Nobel Prize-winning Economist*
- Four years is too long, Brad
Post a Comment