Via Brad DeLong, Eric Falkenstein praises Macroeconomics with faint damns:
Macroeconomics is the triumph of hope over experience, and has been no more successful than sociology.
Insulting
our betters will not put economists in good stead. As Paul Krugman frequently
notes, "Economics is...not quite as hard as sociology."*
But Falkenstein makes up for this lapse, perhaps, with his conclusion:
Macroeconomists are demonstrably not helpful to those institutions that could use economic expertise. Macroeconomists know a lot of stuff, just not anything useful.
I'll still maintain, and
am pleased to see John Quiggin appearing to concur, that The Problem with Macro is believing that it must be a subset of Micro in general and "rational expectations" in particular, leaving the question of what exactly Macro contributes as an exercise. So I'm less ready to make that declaration that Dr. Falkenstein is. But my previous following-the-Devil-in-the-desert comment (see the Update
here) seems more and more the correct description of modern macro.
At least when physics looks for GUTs, they know when they haven't found one.
*It is left as an exercise to the reader whether the elided part of that quotation is true, a comparison of apples and oranges, or misses that physics includes people and matter.
Related Posts by Categories
21st Century economic philosophy- PSA: D-Squared Rivals Quiggin
- Verklaerte KristolNacht
- If You're Marking a Curve, you need to identify an equilibrium point
- The Measured Version of My Screaming
- Norman Borlaug, Michael Jackson, and the Invisible Hand
- Coming Soon from Major Economists Near You
- Quote of the Day, esp. for Economic Modelling
- Mark Cuban Makes the Key Point
- A/l/a/n/ C/a/r/u/b/a/ Milt Shook Explains It All
- I'm Not Here
- The Hoover Institution
- What is competition?
- DeLong, Thoma, Rodrik et al. Do Good
- A Response to Megan McArdle, Again (by cactus)
- The Problem with Macro is Micro
- QOTD, and a bookmark for a future post
- Simple Answers to Simple Questions, CRA edition
- A Short Note on Optimality
- It Looks Like a Great House. Why Does the Basement Always Flood?
- I Remember When Mankiw was still a Neo-Keynesian
- UnReal Business Cycle
- Yankee Interlude
- And Here I Thought Corporations were Rational
- 1,121 Words on Bruce's Post, with footnote
Brad DeLong- Brad DeLong is Correct
- Brad's Draft Lecture
- Verklaerte KristolNacht
- Coming Soon from Major Economists Near You
- Thanks to Ben Bernanke, Ben Bernanke Doesn't Need to be Reappointed as Fed Chair
- Those Who Think the "Left of Center" is Too Tough on N. Gregory Mankiw
- Simple Answers to Simple Questions, CRA edition
- curiouser and curiouser capitalist
- Silliness from Time Magazine
- Tom Toles is a Priceless National Treasure, Vol XIII
- I Agree with Hank Paulson, not Paul Krugman
- Back-of-the-Envelope: Making Sense of TARP
- Being sub-A, we try harder?
- Brad DeLong (Desperately?) Tries to Rationalise the Giveaway
- Stimulus Update
- Game, Set, and Match
- Why Can Asset Prices Fall
- NBER generally gets it right
- NBER generally gets it right
- In Which I Say Something Nice about Lawrence Summers
- In Which I Say Something Nice about Lawrence Summers
- On the Internet, no one knows you're a Nobel Prize-winning Economist*
- On the Internet, no one knows you're a Nobel Prize-winning Economist*
- Four years is too long, Brad
Post a Comment