Brad DeLong has the breakdown of things taken out of the no-longer-possible-to-defend-as-stimulating stimulus bill.
Nice to see that no Republican, and precious few Democratic Senators, believe in following even Andrew Samwick's tepid endorsement:
Congress and the Obama Administration should be very discriminating in what they will spend money on. Bailout money for banks and large firms should go. Every piece of pork in the stimulus bill should go. Every additional tax cut should go. What should remain are the highest value public infrastructure projects, many of which the government has been deferring for years or decades.
which is a minor modification of
his previous position:
[A]s I will continue to blog until I am blue in the fingers, the appropriate course of action when the economic downturn appears like it will be unusually severe is to bring planned capital projects forward in time. Doing so allows them to be done more cheaply.
This would be especially true of the non-"highest value" projects, as an Finance person can tell you. (At 2%, it might have a positive NPV; at 5% and full employment, it will, er, "crowd out.")
Related Posts by Categories
Brad DeLong- Brad DeLong is Correct
- Brad's Draft Lecture
- When in Crisis, Insult Sociologists?
- Verklaerte KristolNacht
- Coming Soon from Major Economists Near You
- Thanks to Ben Bernanke, Ben Bernanke Doesn't Need to be Reappointed as Fed Chair
- Those Who Think the "Left of Center" is Too Tough on N. Gregory Mankiw
- Simple Answers to Simple Questions, CRA edition
- curiouser and curiouser capitalist
- Silliness from Time Magazine
- Tom Toles is a Priceless National Treasure, Vol XIII
- I Agree with Hank Paulson, not Paul Krugman
- Back-of-the-Envelope: Making Sense of TARP
- Being sub-A, we try harder?
- Brad DeLong (Desperately?) Tries to Rationalise the Giveaway
- Game, Set, and Match
- Why Can Asset Prices Fall
- NBER generally gets it right
- NBER generally gets it right
- In Which I Say Something Nice about Lawrence Summers
- In Which I Say Something Nice about Lawrence Summers
- On the Internet, no one knows you're a Nobel Prize-winning Economist*
- On the Internet, no one knows you're a Nobel Prize-winning Economist*
- Four years is too long, Brad
21st Century economic philosophy- PSA: D-Squared Rivals Quiggin
- When in Crisis, Insult Sociologists?
- Verklaerte KristolNacht
- If You're Marking a Curve, you need to identify an equilibrium point
- The Measured Version of My Screaming
- Norman Borlaug, Michael Jackson, and the Invisible Hand
- Coming Soon from Major Economists Near You
- Quote of the Day, esp. for Economic Modelling
- Mark Cuban Makes the Key Point
- A/l/a/n/ C/a/r/u/b/a/ Milt Shook Explains It All
- I'm Not Here
- The Hoover Institution
- What is competition?
- DeLong, Thoma, Rodrik et al. Do Good
- A Response to Megan McArdle, Again (by cactus)
- The Problem with Macro is Micro
- QOTD, and a bookmark for a future post
- Simple Answers to Simple Questions, CRA edition
- A Short Note on Optimality
- It Looks Like a Great House. Why Does the Basement Always Flood?
- I Remember When Mankiw was still a Neo-Keynesian
- UnReal Business Cycle
- Yankee Interlude
- And Here I Thought Corporations were Rational
- 1,121 Words on Bruce's Post, with footnote
Post a Comment