GMAC Flashback

The whining has started, with most people (e.g., Chris Whalen at The Big Picture) making the obvious mistake of confusing GMAC with General Motors.

In the interest of history, I quote myself from the Dark Ages (March 2007) at Tom's Place:

The next time GM explains that its pensioners need to take a hit, it won't be because car sales have fallen.

It will be because of their subprime mortgage lending [original link expired]:

GMAC's ResCap unit, which specializes in housing finance, reported $48 billion in subprime loans -- about 76 percent of its mortgage portfolio as of year end.

ResCap increased its allowance for loan losses to 2.17 percent at year-end from 1.55 percent a year earlier and reported a spike in nonperforming loans to 10.5 percent of its mortgage portfolio.

...

GMAC said it earned $1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2006, compared with $112 million a year earlier. The results included a $791 million tax benefit from its conversion to a limited liability company.

Translation: that's another $791 million that GM pensioners and others will have to pay into the general fund.

Loaning to the auto industry may be dicey, but it pales compared to a mortgage portfolio that was 76% subprime at the end of 2006.

GMAC may "need" to be bailed out, but that's not because of its auto industry exposure.

Related Posts by Categories

bailout

• TARP, Yet Again: Inflationary?
• Thanks to Ben Bernanke, Ben Bernanke Doesn't Need to be Reappointed as Fed Chair
• Peter Dorman of Econospeak Writes, So I Don't Have To
• PPIP: Bad, Maybe, But Not THAT bad
• Back-of-the-Envelope: Making Sense of TARP
• Dear Brad and Mark (et al.)
• From Insurance to Kleptocracy, with Graphics
• Being sub-A, we try harder?
• If You Think I Believe it's 1931 Again, You Should Ask the Greek Guy
• For those who are interested in not staying in Hooverville II
• Thought-Experiment: Assets and Securities
• Risk and Aversion, Take 2
• The Two Sides of AIG
• This Makes More Sense--or Does It?
• Can We Stop Pretending Nationalisation is a Bad Idea? The WSJ has.
• Still KISSING income inequality
• A Spoonful of Sugar and TARP Part 2
• The TARP-May-Produce-a-Profit Meme can now be laid to rest
• The Only Good Crowding-Out Argument
• Simple Answer to a Simple Question
• Legacy Merrill Lynch employees better hope BofA doesn't declare bankrutcy before late June
• Random Notes, or, More Posts I Don't Have to Write
• "Ben Tre Logic" Redux: History Repeats Itself
• "Ben Tre Logic" Redux: History Repeats Itself

Bank failure

• Rumours of "Green Shoots" are Exaggerated: Illinois
• Noted for the Record, Failed Bank edition
• "Banks Just Don’t Go Under"
• Someone whose list of Bad Banks Matches Mine--and Goes Further
• May Day MayDay
• Georgia is #1; Citigroup is worse than bankrupt
• Dear Brad and Mark (et al.)
• Interlude
• Legacy Merrill Lynch employees better hope BofA doesn't declare bankrutcy before late June
• If Ever There Were a Tipping Point in the Nationalisation Discussions...
• Can we please broaden our thinking in this crisis?
• Can we please broaden our thinking in this crisis?
• The Safest Senator
• The Safest Senator
• We have part of an answer
• We have part of an answer
• Roubini's not wrong, but...
• Roubini's not wrong, but...
• The OTHER Reason SonofaBirch and Biden would result in a McCain victory
• The OTHER Reason SonofaBirch and Biden would result in a McCain victory
• The WSJ Editorial Page: Fumbling Toward Accuracy II
• The WSJ Editorial Page: Fumbling Toward Accuracy II
• Before netting, before zero sum ownership society
• Before netting, before zero sum ownership society

GM

• Was GM et al asking for Central Planning (as in communism)?
• Was GM et al asking for Central Planning (as in communism)?

Widget by Hoctro | Jack Book